Trump, Tiptoeing the Edge of the Constitution: The Night Before Taking Office, He Capitalized on a MEME Coin Craze
Original Article by: Zack Guzmán, Founder and Host of Coinage_media
Article Translation by: Ashley, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: The author points out that the Trump family cleverly circumvented the Constitution's Emoluments Clause controversy when launching the $TRUMP and $MELANIA tokens. By strategically entering the NFT and cryptocurrency space early on, they leveraged Web3 to maximize their interests within legal boundaries.
The following is the original content (slightly reorganized for better readability):
The Trump family rapidly rolled out the $TRUMP and $MELANIA tokens just before the inauguration ceremony for a very crucial reason. Whether you love or hate Trump, the fact is, delaying even one more day could have exposed him to the risk of constitutional violations and potential impeachment once again.
According to the Constitution, the President must not abuse their power for personal gain. In particular, the Emoluments Clause explicitly prohibits the President from receiving benefits or profits from foreign governments. This is precisely why these tokens are so noteworthy.
Over the past few years, the Trump couple has been testing the market waters through various NFT releases. They have used separate companies and seemingly different teams. These companies have paid Melania and Trump respective fees, thus maintaining the "independence" of direct token purchases.

According to Trump's public tax filings, he earned approximately $7.2 million through involvement in NFT-related transactions. This income is linked to his partnership with CIC Digital in the $TRUMP project. Melania, on the other hand, earned over $330,000 through an agreement related to NFT sales.

Despite all this appearing convoluted, one thing is certain: launching these tokens before Trump formally became President made things easier. Failing to do so would have made it easier to allege that Trump benefited from the presidency and violated the Emoluments Clause.
While our founding fathers hoped to prevent the President from unduly profiting from power, I don't think Jefferson or Madison ever discussed meme coins. What do you think?
You may also like
Why Crypto Traders Are Watching Gold and Nasdaq Again in 2026

After Futu Securities was banned, will buying stocks on-chain be the new remedy?

The secret to Hyperliquid's success dismantled from the five-layer financial stack

a16z: 7 Images to Understand How Tokenization Changes the Nature of Assets

Why have foreign exchange stablecoins never taken off?

AIDC, computing power leasing, and cloud: The "three-part thesis" of AI transformation in cryptocurrency mining farms

Futu has had all its illegal gains confiscated, reminding cryptocurrency exchanges

Football, Web3 & Champions' Energy: A Recap of WEEX's LALIGA VIP Meetup in Barcelona
Pizza, Poker & AI Trading: A Recap of WEEX Crypto Pizza Day in Dubai

Morning Report | SpaceX reveals it holds approximately $1.45 billion in Bitcoin; Nvidia's Q1 financial report shows revenue of $81.6 billion; Manus plans to raise $1 billion for buyback business

IOSG Founder: Please tell Vitalik the truth, let the OGs who have enjoyed the industry's dividends enlighten the young people

Insiders: DeepSeek is forming a Harness team to compete with Claude Code

The financial changes under the new SEC regulations: Opportunities and regulatory red lines behind "tokenized stocks"

SpaceX officially submitted its prospectus, unveiling the largest IPO in history

Blockchain Capital Partner: The structure of on-chain dual-layer capital is still in the early stages of value discovery

I tested with $10,000: zero wear and tear, annualized 8%, and can earn points (with complete tutorial + screenshots)

Secured over $60 million in funding from Dragonfly, Sequoia, and others, learn about the on-chain derivatives protocol Variational | CryptoSeed

